Winner
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2 based on its cost to run and value.
See full details Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs E5 1650 v2 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
- 3.5 GHz
- Hexa core
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
 | Supports more RAM 786,432 MB | | Significantly more l3 cache 15 MB |
| | More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.33 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2
- 3.5 GHz
- Hexa core
5.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5 1650 v2
| | Much better performance per watt 13.53 pt/W | | Much better performance per dollar 3.02 pt/$ |
| | Higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz | | Lower typical power consumption 105.63W |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-1650 v3 vs 1650 v2 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports more RAM | 786,432 MB | vs | 262,144 MB | Supports 3x more RAM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 12 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 4.21 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.55 GHz | vs | 4.45 GHz | Almost the same | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2014 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date a year later | |||
| |||||||
| Much better performance per watt | 13.53 pt/W | vs | 1.86 pt/W | More than 7.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.02 pt/$ | vs | 0.44 pt/$ | More than 6.8x better performance per dollar | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.8 GHz | Around 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 105.63W | vs | 113.75W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | vs | 122.64 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | vs | 33.73 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs E5 1650 v2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | E5 1650 v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Hexa core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 140W | 130W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 33.73 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 122.64 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.86 pt/W | 13.53 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 113.75W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 0 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 0 MT/s | 0 MT/s | |
details | Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | E5 1650 v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 12 | 12 | |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | 12 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 66.7°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.33 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.55 GHz | 4.45 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.33 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 59,733.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 262,144 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $583 | $583 | |
| E5-1650 vs 1650 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $294 | $583 | |
| 1620 v2 vs 1650 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $435 | $583 | |
| 4930K vs 1650 v2 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $297 | $586 | |
| E5-1620 v3 vs E5-1650 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $586 | |
| 6700K vs E5-1650 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $580 | $586 | |
| 5930K vs E5-1650 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $586 | ||
| E5-1650V4 vs E5-1650 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
