CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-1650 v3 vs E5-2690V4 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel E5-2690V4 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel E5-2690V4  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.33 GHz vs 3.32 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,129 vs 1,917 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per dollar 0.44 pt/$ vs 0.33 pt/$ More than 35% better performance per dollar
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz vs 3.17 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel E5-2690V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2690V4

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 35 MB vs 15 MB More than 2.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 14 vs 6 8 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 28 vs 12 16 more threads
Much better PassMark score 21,801 vs 13,560 More than 60% better PassMark score
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 786,432 MB Supports 2x more RAM
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 89 °C vs 66.7 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly better performance per watt 5.06 pt/W vs 1.86 pt/W Around 2.8x better performance per watt
Slightly lower typical power consumption 109.69W vs 113.75W Around 5% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jul, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year vs 33.73 $/year Around 5% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year vs 122.64 $/year Around 5% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs E5-2690V4

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-1650 v3
9,276.5
E5-2690V4
70,161

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-1650 v3
3,895 MB/s
E5-2690V4
3,670 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-2690V4
21,801

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-1650 v3  vs
E5-2690V4 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Hexa core Processing Cores

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
AVX
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 140W 135W
Annual home energy cost 33.73 $/year 32.52 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 122.64 $/year 118.26 $/year
Performance per watt 1.86 pt/W 5.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 113.75W 109.69W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 0 2
Transfer rate 0 MT/s 9,600 MT/s
Clock speed 0 MHz 4,800 MHz

details

Xeon E5-1650 v3  vs
E5-2690V4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 28
L3 cache 15 MB 35 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.7°C Unknown - 89°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.33 GHz 3.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz 3.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.33 GHz 3.32 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 1,572,864 MB
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
Report a correction
Intel E5-2690V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus