CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-1650 v3 vs E5-1620V4 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 13,560 vs 10,062 Around 35% better PassMark score
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 8 4 more threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.33 GHz vs 3.59 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz vs 3.78 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel E5-1620V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-1620V4

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 786,432 MB Supports 2x more RAM
Newer Apr, 2016 vs Jul, 2014 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs E5-1620V4

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-1620V4
10,062

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-1650 v3  vs
E5-1620V4 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
AVX
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 140W 140W
Annual home energy cost 33.73 $/year 33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 122.64 $/year 122.64 $/year
Performance per watt 1.86 pt/W 2.32 pt/W
Typical power consumption 113.75W 113.75W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 0 0
Transfer rate 0 MT/s 0 MT/s

details

Xeon E5-1650 v3  vs
E5-1620V4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 12 8
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.7°C Unknown - 69°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.33 GHz 3.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.55 GHz 3.78 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.33 GHz 3.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 1,572,864 MB
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
Report a correction
Intel E5-1620V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus