Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2 vs 1620 v2 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2
- 3.5 GHz
- Hexa core
5.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | More cores 6 |
| | More l2 cache 1.5 MB | | More l3 cache 12 MB |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
- 3.7 GHz
- Quad core
5.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 1620 v2
| | Significantly higher clock speed 3.7 GHz | | More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1650 v2 vs 1620 v2 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l2 cache | 1.5 MB | vs | 1 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l3 cache | 12 MB | vs | 10 MB | 20% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 12 | vs | 8 | 4 more threads | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.45 GHz | vs | 4.03 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 1650 v2 vs 1620 v2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 1650 v2 | vs | 1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 130W | 130W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.53 pt/W | 13.06 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
| Number of links | 0 | 0 | |
details | Xeon E5 1650 v2 | vs | 1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 12 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 10 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 35 | 37 | |
| Voltage range | 0.65 - 1.3V | 0.65 - 1.3V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.21 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.45 GHz | 4.03 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.21 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 59,733.32 MB/s | 59,733.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 262,144 MB | 262,144 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $294 | |
| 4770K vs 1620 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $294 | $294 | |
| E5-1620 vs 1620 v2 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $583 | ||
| E5-2689 vs 1650 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $586 | $583 | |
| E5-1650 v3 vs 1650 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,155 | $583 | |
| 2650 v2 vs 1650 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $583 | $583 | |
| E5-1650 vs 1650 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $435 | $583 | |
| 4930K vs 1650 v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
