0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i7 4770K |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-1620
- 3.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-1620
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes | ![]() | Slightly more l3 cache 10 MB |
![]() | Supports more RAM 384,000 MB | ![]() | More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770K
![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 1.97 fps | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly more l3 cache | 10 MB | vs | 8 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Supports more RAM | 384,000 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports around 11.8x more RAM | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | 1.97 fps | vs | 0.62 fps | Around 3.2x better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 105.63W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.83 pt/$ | vs | 3.3 pt/$ | More than 15% better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 11.31 pt/W | vs | 7.47 pt/W | More than 50% better performance per watt | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 3,689 | vs | 3,066 | More than 20% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.48 GHz | vs | 3.93 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.72 °C | vs | 64 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Mar, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i7 4770K
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Xeon E5-1620
0.62 fps
Core i7 4770K
1.97 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-1620
12,397
Core i7 4770K
14,184
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-1620
3,066
Core i7 4770K
3,689
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-1620
2,460,000 MB/s
Core i7 4770K
4,810,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-1620
13,003
Core i7 4770K
14,351
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-1620
13,786
Core i7 4770K
15,778
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-1620
9,487
Core i7 4770K
10,016
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-1620
2,117
Core i7 4770K
2,165
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.47 pt/W | 11.31 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 0 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 0 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 10 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 64°C | Unknown - 72.72°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.93 GHz | 4.48 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.7 GHz | 4.55 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.93 GHz | 4.48 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,250 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 51,200 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 384,000 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 ![]() | Intel Core i7 4770K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $248 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$192 | $248 | |
Intel Core i5 4670K vs i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $248 | |
AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $248 | |
Intel Core i7 3770K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$260 | $248 | |
Intel Core i7 4820K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $248 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4770K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||