Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-1620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-1620

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz 2x higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache 10 MB vs 2 MB 5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Much more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 5x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Sep, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
Front view of AMD Opteron 2346 HE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2346 HE

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 105.63W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 113.88 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 31.32 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-1620  vs Opteron 2346 HE 

clock speed

Xeon E5-1620
3.6 GHz
Opteron 2346 HE
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon E5-1620
3.93 GHz
Opteron 2346 HE
1.8 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon E5-1620
4.7 GHz
Opteron 2346 HE
1.8 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-1620  vs
Opteron 2346 HE 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 2011
F

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 130W 55W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 48.18 $/year
Typical power consumption 105.63W 44.69W

bus

Clock speed 0 MHz 1,000 MHz

details

Xeon E5-1620  vs
Opteron 2346 HE 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 10 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Clock multiplier 38 9
Voltage range 0.6 - 1.35V 1.12 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 64°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.93 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.7 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon E5-1620
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2346 HE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus