0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs Core i7 4790K |
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
- 3.7 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 5.78 pt/$ | ![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
![]() | Slightly more l3 cache 10 MB | ![]() | More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Core i7 4790K
- 4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4790K
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 4.4 GHz | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 5.78 pt/$ | vs | 3.69 pt/$ | More than 55% better performance per dollar | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Slightly more l3 cache | 10 MB | vs | 8 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Supports more RAM | 262,144 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 8x more RAM | |||
Better performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | vs | 11.42 pt/W | Around 15% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 4.4 GHz | vs | 3.9 GHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.7 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 71.5W | vs | 105.63W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 15,490 | vs | 12,932 | Around 20% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 4,004 | vs | 3,262 | Around 25% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.63 GHz | vs | 4.21 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 21.2 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 77.09 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.04 °C | vs | 70 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 4.03 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date 9 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs Core i7 4790K
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 1620 v2
12,932
Core i7 4790K
15,490
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 1620 v2
3,262
Core i7 4790K
4,004
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 1620 v2
2,650,000 MB/s
Core i7 4790K
5,140,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 1620 v2 | vs | Core i7 4790K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 88W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 21.2 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 77.09 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | 11.42 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 71.5W | |
bus | |||
Number of links | 0 | 0 |
details | Xeon E5 1620 v2 | vs | Core i7 4790K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 10 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 74.04°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.21 GHz | 4.63 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.03 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.21 GHz | 4.63 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,250 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 59,733.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 262,144 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 ![]() | Intel Core i7 4790K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $240 | |
4790K vs 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $390 | |
4790K vs 5820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $248 | |
4790K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $305 | |
4790K vs 4790 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $250 | |
4790K vs 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $230 | |
4790K vs 9590 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||