CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1620 v2 vs 4770 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Xeon E5 1620 v2
5.6
Core i7 4770
7.5
Core i7 3770
6.9
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Xeon E5 1620 v2
7.9
Core i7 4770
9.1
Core i7 3770
8.5
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Xeon E5 1620 v2
0.0
Core i7 4770
9.4
Core i7 3770
6.8
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Xeon E5 1620 v2
0.0
Core i7 4770
7.1
Core i7 3770
5.8
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Xeon E5 1620 v2
5.0
Core i7 4770
5.3
Core i7 3770
5.2
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Xeon E5 1620 v2
n.d.
Core i7 4770
6.2
Core i7 3770
6.1
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
8.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Xeon E5 1620 v2
5.3
Core i7 4770
8.6
Core i7 3770
7.9

Winner
Intel Core i7 4770 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770

Intel Core i7 4770

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 5.78 pt/$ vs 3.12 pt/$ More than 85% better performance per dollar
Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Slightly more l3 cache 10 MB vs 8 MB 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Better performance per watt 13.06 pt/W vs 10.41 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Supports more RAM 262,144 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 8x more RAM
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.21 GHz vs 3.85 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 105.63W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Better geekbench 3 single core score 3,514 vs 3,262 Around 10% better geekbench 3 single core score
Much lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 31.32 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 113.88 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs Core i7 4770

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5 1620 v2
12,932
Core i7 4770
13,342

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5 1620 v2
3,262
Core i7 4770
3,514

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5 1620 v2
2,650,000 MB/s
Core i7 4770
4,500,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Xeon E5 1620 v2  vs
Core i7 4770 
Clock speed 3.7 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption
TDP 130W 84W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 13.06 pt/W 10.41 pt/W
Typical power consumption 105.63W 68.25W

bus
Number of links 0 0

details

 Xeon E5 1620 v2  vs
Core i7 4770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 10 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 72.72°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 4.21 GHz 3.85 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.03 GHz 4.01 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.21 GHz 3.85 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 59,733.32 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 262,144 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss