0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs Core i7 4770 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
- 3.7 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 5.78 pt/$ | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz |
![]() | Slightly more l3 cache 10 MB | ![]() | Better performance per watt 13.06 pt/W |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 single core score 3,514 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 5.78 pt/$ | vs | 3.12 pt/$ | More than 85% better performance per dollar | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Slightly more l3 cache | 10 MB | vs | 8 MB | 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Better performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | vs | 10.41 pt/W | More than 25% better performance per watt | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
Supports more RAM | 262,144 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 8x more RAM | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.21 GHz | vs | 3.85 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 105.63W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 3,514 | vs | 3,262 | Around 10% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs Core i7 4770
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 1620 v2
12,932
Core i7 4770
13,342
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 1620 v2
3,262
Core i7 4770
3,514
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 1620 v2
2,650,000 MB/s
Core i7 4770
4,500,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 1620 v2 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | 10.41 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Number of links | 0 | 0 |
details | Xeon E5 1620 v2 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 10 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70°C | Unknown - 72.72°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.21 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.03 GHz | 4.01 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.21 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 59,733.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 262,144 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 ![]() | Intel Core i7 4770 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 4790 vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $280 | |
Intel Core i5 4570 vs i7 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$192 | $280 | |
Intel Core i5 4670K vs i7 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
AMD A10 7800 vs Intel Core i7 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs 4770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||