Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 vs E5-1410 |
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2
- 2.8 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2
 | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Newer Jan, 2014 |
by Chris-Angelini (Jan, 2014)It’s targeting everything from tablets to notebooks with very powerful integrated graphics, and doing a really good job, in my opinion.
VS
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-1410
- 2.8 GHz
- Quad core
by Johan-De-Gelas (Sep, 2014)It is clear that Intel has improved AVX efficiency quite a bit.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer | Jan, 2014 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E5-1410 vs the E5-1410 v2. | |||||||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-1410 v2 vs E5-1410
clock speed
turbo clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-1410 v2 | vs | E5-1410 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 80W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 65W | |
details | Xeon E5-1410 v2 | vs | E5-1410 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 10 MB | 10 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.65 - 1.3V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 38,400 MB/s | 31,999.98 MB/s | |
 Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-1410 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel N4200 vs Core i3 6100U | ||
