CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3113 vs E3-1220 v5 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3113

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3113

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 65W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 70.08 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 19.27 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better PassMark score 7,691 vs 2,427 Around 3.2x better PassMark score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,976 vs 1,270 More than 55% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Sep, 2008 Release date over 7 years later
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.53 GHz vs 3.93 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 3.35 pt/W vs 1.86 pt/W More than 80% better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3113 vs E3-1220 v5

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3113  vs
E3-1220 v5 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 80W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 19.27 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 70.08 $/year
Performance per watt 1.86 pt/W 3.35 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 65W

details

Xeon E3113  vs
E3-1220 v5 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 45 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.95 - 1.21V 0.55 - 1.52V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.93 GHz 4.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz 4.53 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon E3113
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus