CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3113 vs 860 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 860 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 860  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i7 860

Intel Core i7 860

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3113

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3113

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 156.35W 3x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 53.98 $/year 3.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 157.68 $/year 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 1.86 pt/W vs 0.96 pt/W Around 95% better performance per watt
Front view of Intel Core i7 860

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 860

Report a correction
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 5,051 vs 2,427 More than 2x better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.15 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.14 GHz vs 3.93 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2009 vs Sep, 2008 Release date 9 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3113 vs Core i7 860

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E3113
2,427
Core i7 860
5,051

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon E3113
1,270
Core i7 860
1,226

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3113  vs
Core i7 860 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1156

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 53.98 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 157.68 $/year
Performance per watt 1.86 pt/W 0.96 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 156.35W

details

Xeon E3113  vs
Core i7 860 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 8
L2 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.95 - 1.21V 0.65 - 1.4V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.93 GHz 4.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 4.15 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.93 GHz 4.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon E3113
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 860
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus