0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E3110 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 |
Released January, 2008
Intel Xeon E3110
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3110
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
VS
Released January, 2007
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q6600
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,490 |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E3110CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 85.31W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.25 GHz | vs | 3.52 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,267 | vs | 924 | More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.4 °C | vs | 62.2 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better performance per watt | 2.01 pt/W | vs | 1.19 pt/W | Around 70% better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Jan, 2008 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over a year later | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,490 | vs | 3,081 | More than 45% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3110 vs Core2 Quad Q6600
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3110
3,081
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,490
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3110
1,697
Core2 Quad Q6600
1,306
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3110
123,300 MB/s
Core2 Quad Q6600
102,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3110
2,858
Core2 Quad Q6600
4,161
GeekBench
Xeon E3110
3,453
Core2 Quad Q6600
5,918
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E3110
2,169
Core2 Quad Q6600
2,970
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E3110
1,267
Core2 Quad Q6600
924
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3110 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.01 pt/W | 1.19 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Xeon E3110 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 410,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.4°C | Unknown - 62.2°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 3 | 278 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 4.25 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.25 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon E3110 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Q6600 vs Q8200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | ||
Q6600 vs 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||