CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3110 vs 6200U among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 6200U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 6200U  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Intel Core i5 6200U

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3110

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3110

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 0.5 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 0.73 pt/$ vs 0.56 pt/$ Around 30% better performance per dollar
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 52.81W 4.3x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 7 years later
Much better performance per watt 10.56 pt/W vs 2.01 pt/W More than 5.2x better performance per watt
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,551 vs 3,081 More than 80% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,500 vs 1,267 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 4.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 4.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3110 vs Core i5 6200U

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E3110
123,300 MB/s
Core i5 6200U
3,610 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3110  vs
Core i5 6200U 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 15W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 2.01 pt/W 10.56 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 12.19W

details

Xeon E3110  vs
Core i5 6200U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 6 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.25 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz 2.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 520
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon E3110
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus