Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs E3-1225 |
Released October, 2015
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
- 3.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
 | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Higher turbo clock speed 4 GHz |
| | Higher clock speed 3.6 GHz | | Better PassMark score 10,346 |
VS
Released April, 2011
Intel Xeon E3-1225
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E3-1225
| | Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz | | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,350 MHz |
| | Better performance per dollar 1.01 pt/$ |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | Around 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 10,346 | vs | 5,954 | Around 75% better PassMark score | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Slightly more l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 77.19W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,164 | vs | 1,747 | Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better performance per watt | 3.54 pt/W | vs | 2.31 pt/W | Around 55% better performance per watt | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | More than 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 1.01 pt/$ | vs | 0.8 pt/$ | More than 25% better performance per dollar | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs E3-1225
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1275 v5 | vs | E3-1225 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Xeon E3-1275 v5 | vs | E3-1225 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 4 | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics P530 | Intel® HD Graphics P3000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 850 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 1,350 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.54 pt/W | 2.31 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E3-1225 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $205 | $217 | |
| 2400 vs E3-1225 | ||
 | VS | |
| $264 | $217 | |
| 3770K vs E3-1225 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $217 | |
| 3770 vs E3-1225 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $217 | |
| 3470 vs E3-1225 | ||
 | VS | |
| $300 | $217 | |
| 2500 vs E3-1225 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $355 | |
| 6700K vs E3-1275 v5 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $355 | |
| 6700 vs E3-1275 v5 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
