Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 3 MB Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 10,346 vs 4,786 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4 GHz vs 3.47 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 15% higher GPU clock speed
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,164 vs 1,963 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4 GHz vs 3.58 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i3 4130

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4130

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 7.2 pt/$ vs 0.8 pt/$ More than 9x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 13.06 pt/W vs 3.54 pt/W Around 3.8x better performance per watt
Significantly lower typical power consumption 43.88W vs 65W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year vs 70.08 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year vs 19.27 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs Core i3 4130

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E3-1275 v5
5,405 MB/s
Core i3 4130
3,840,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1275 v5  vs
Core i3 4130 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 54W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 13.01 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 47.3 $/year
Performance per watt 3.54 pt/W 13.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 43.88W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E3-1275 v5  vs
Core i3 4130 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L3 cache 8 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4 GHz 3.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4 GHz 3.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4 GHz 3.47 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics P530 Intel® HD graphics 4400
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz 1,150 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 4130
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus