0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs Core i3 4130 |
Released October, 2015
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
- 3.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | More l3 cache 8 MB |
![]() | Higher clock speed 3.6 GHz | ![]() | Significantly better PassMark score 10,346 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i3 4130
- 3.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 4130
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 7.2 pt/$ | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 13.06 pt/W |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 43.88W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Higher clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 10,346 | vs | 4,786 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4 GHz | vs | 3.47 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 15% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,164 | vs | 1,963 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4 GHz | vs | 3.58 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per dollar | 7.2 pt/$ | vs | 0.8 pt/$ | More than 9x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better performance per watt | 13.06 pt/W | vs | 3.54 pt/W | Around 3.8x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 43.88W | vs | 65W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs Core i3 4130
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1275 v5
14,383
Core i3 4130
6,330
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1275 v5
4,333.5
Core i3 4130
2,982
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1275 v5
5,405 MB/s
Core i3 4130
3,840,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E3-1275 v5
10,346
Core i3 4130
4,786
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E3-1275 v5
2,164
Core i3 4130
1,963
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1275 v5 | vs | Core i3 4130 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 54W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 13.01 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 47.3 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.54 pt/W | 13.06 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 43.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E3-1275 v5 | vs | Core i3 4130 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 4 | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.47 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4 GHz | 3.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4 GHz | 3.47 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics P530 | Intel® HD graphics 4400 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 ![]() | Intel Core i3 4130 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $100 | |
4130 vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $70 | |
4130 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $75 | |
4130 vs G3250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $70 | |
4130 vs G3258 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $125 | |
4130 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $205 | |
4130 vs 2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $180 | |
4130 vs 3470 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||