0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs E3-1240 v2 |
VS
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E3-1240 v2
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 56.06W |
![]() | Newer May, 2012 | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 60.44 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E3-1270 vs the E3-1240 v2. | |||||||
| |||||||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower typical power consumption | 56.06W | vs | 65W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 60.44 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 16.62 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1270 vs E3-1240 v2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270
5,885
Xeon E3-1240 v2
12,093
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270
2,670
Xeon E3-1240 v2
3,105
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270
1,980,000 MB/s
Xeon E3-1240 v2
2,500,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270
11,216
Xeon E3-1240 v2
12,038
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270
14,722
Xeon E3-1240 v2
12,415
GeekBench
Xeon E3-1270
14,722
Xeon E3-1240 v2
15,624
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E3-1270
9,832
Xeon E3-1240 v2
9,202
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E3-1270
2,222
Xeon E3-1240 v2
2,039
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1270 | vs | E3-1240 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 69W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 16.62 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 60.44 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.9 pt/W | 15.68 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 56.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E3-1270 | vs | E3-1240 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 34 | 34 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 1 | 10 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 33,556.48 MB |
Intel Xeon E3-1270 ![]() | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | $240 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Core i7 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | $225 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs E3-1230 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$336 | $355 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$336 | $240 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs Core i7 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$336 | $225 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs E3-1230 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$336 | $305 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs Core i7 2600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$336 | $391 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs E5520 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||