CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1270 v5 vs E5-1630V4 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 65W vs 113.75W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Better geekbench 3 AES single core score 5,260 MB/s vs 4,150 MB/s More than 25% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year vs 33.73 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year vs 122.64 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 3.49 pt/W vs 2.07 pt/W Around 70% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel E5-1630V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-1630V4

Report a correction
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 65,536 MB Supports 24x more RAM
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 16,559 vs 15,232 Around 10% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Apr, 2016 vs Oct, 2015 Release date 6 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs E5-1630V4

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E5-1630V4
16,559

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E3-1270 v5
5,260 MB/s
E5-1630V4
4,150 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E5-1630V4
10,360

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1270 v5  vs
E5-1630V4 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo clock speed 4 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 140W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 122.64 $/year
Performance per watt 3.49 pt/W 2.07 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 113.75W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 0
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 0 MT/s

details

Xeon E3-1270 v5  vs
E5-1630V4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4 GHz 3.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4 GHz 3.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4 GHz 3.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 1,572,864 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
Report a correction
Intel E5-1630V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus