CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1270 v3 vs E3-1270 v2 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 5.3 pt/$ vs 0.68 pt/$ Around 7.8x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 22.53 pt/W vs 3.52 pt/W Around 6.5x better performance per watt
Newer Apr, 2013 vs May, 2012 Release date 10 months later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,222 vs 2,072 More than 5% better PassMark (Single core) score
Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v2

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly lower typical power consumption 56.06W vs 65W Around 15% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 16.62 $/year vs 19.27 $/year Around 15% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 60.44 $/year vs 70.08 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs v2

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E3-1270 v3
4,560,000 MB/s
Xeon E3-1270 v2
2,620 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1270 v3  vs
v2 
Clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 33,556.48 MB

details

Xeon E3-1270 v3  vs
v2 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Number of displays supported N/A 0

power consumption

TDP 80W 69W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 16.62 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 60.44 $/year
Performance per watt 22.53 pt/W 3.52 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 56.06W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 0 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v2
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus