Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs E3-1230 v3 |
Released April, 2013
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.7 GHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E3-1230 v3 vs the E3-1270 v3. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs E3-1230 v3
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | E3-1230 v3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | E3-1230 v3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 80W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 22.48 pt/W | 32.83 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 65W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 0 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $250 | $248 | |
| E3-1230 v3 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $250 | $257 | |
| E3-1230 v3 vs E3-1231 v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $250 | $192 | |
| E3-1230 v3 vs 4670K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $250 | $225 | |
| E3-1230 v3 vs E3-1230 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $250 | $280 | |
| E3-1230 v3 vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $340 | $248 | |
| E3-1270 v3 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS | |
| $340 | $280 | |
| E3-1270 v3 vs 4770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
