0 Comments
| | Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Core i7 4770K |
Released April, 2013
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
| | Supports trusted computing Yes | | Better performance per dollar 4.7 pt/$ |
| | Better performance per watt 19.69 pt/W |
by Ian-Cutress (Oct, 2014)High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770K
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.47 GHz |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.66 GHz | | Marginally newer Jun, 2013 |
by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)The AMD A10-5800K APU hasn't been in the lead in any benchmark yet, but here we can see that it excels in graphics and had an overall score in Fire Strike of 1098, which is 20% faster than the new Intel Core i7-4770K processor.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1270 v3 vs 4770K
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Xeon E3-1270 v3 7.5 Core i7 4770K 7.9 | |
| Passmark and GeekBench | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Xeon E3-1270 v3 9.5 Core i7 4770K 9.3 | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| Xeon E3-1270 v3 5.1 Core i7 4770K 5.1 | |
| TDP | |
Value | |
| | |
| Xeon E3-1270 v3 7.2 Core i7 4770K 6.6 | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better performance per dollar | 4.7 pt/$ | vs | 3.4 pt/$ | Around 40% better performance per dollar | |||
| Better performance per watt | 19.69 pt/W | vs | 13.14 pt/W | Around 50% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.47 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.66 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Marginally newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Apr, 2013 | Release date 2 months later | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Core i7 4770K
GeekBench
Xeon E3-1270 v3
14,722
Core i7 4770K
18,498
Passmark
Xeon E3-1270 v3
10,014
Core i7 4770K
10,016
Core i7 4770K | by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)Futuremark 3DMark has three primary benchmark tests that you can run and which test you should be running depends on the system that you are benchmarking on.
Passmark (Single Core)
Xeon E3-1270 v3
2,271
Core i7 4770K
2,165
Core i7 4770K | by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2013)If you look closer at the results for Cloud Gate you'll see that AMD won in the graphics tests, but lost in the Physics test, so Futuremark 3DMark must have more weight on the physics test than the GPU test in this test scenario.
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| F16C | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,250 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.47 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | 4.66 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | 4.47 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 84W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 19.69 pt/W | 13.14 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 0 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | Intel Core i7 4770K |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| $325 | $249 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $175 | |
| 4770K vs 8350 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $235 | |
| 4770K vs 4670K | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $195 | |
| 4770K vs 4790 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $276 | |
| 4770K vs E3-1240 v3 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $332 | |
| 4770K vs 4820k | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| $325 | $249 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | $161 | |
| 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs N2830 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $97 | |
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 5750M vs 4700MQ | ||
| VS | |
| 5 Octa vs 800 | ||





