Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Core i7 4770 |
Released April, 2013
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
 | Much better performance per dollar 5.29 pt/$ | | Much better performance per watt 22.48 pt/W |
| | Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,222 |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.01 GHz |
| | Newer Jun, 2013 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 5.29 pt/$ | vs | 3.12 pt/$ | Around 70% better performance per dollar | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per watt | 22.48 pt/W | vs | 10.41 pt/W | Around 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,222 | vs | 2,029 | Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.01 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Apr, 2013 | Release date 2 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Core i7 4770
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 84W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 22.48 pt/W | 10.41 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 0 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.89 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.5 GHz | 4.01 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.89 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 4770 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $240 | $280 | |
| 3770 vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $280 | |
| 4790 vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $248 | $280 | |
| 4770K vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $160 | $280 | |
| 4570 vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $192 | $280 | |
| 4670K vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 7800 vs 4770 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $280 | |
| 6700 vs 4770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
