0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 v2 vs E3-1270 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v2
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v2
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
VS
Released April, 2011
Intel Xeon E3-1270
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E3-1270
![]() | Much better performance per watt 10.9 pt/W | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.6 pt/$ |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.4 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.8 GHz | Around 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 56.06W | vs | 65W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 60.44 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 16.62 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 10.9 pt/W | vs | 3.52 pt/W | More than 3x better performance per watt | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.6 pt/$ | vs | 0.69 pt/$ | More than 3.8x better performance per dollar |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1270 v2 vs E3-1270
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270 v2
12,293
Xeon E3-1270
5,885
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270 v2
3,137.5
Xeon E3-1270
2,670
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270 v2
2,620 MB/s
Xeon E3-1270
1,980,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1270 v2
12,299
Xeon E3-1270
11,216
GeekBench
Xeon E3-1270 v2
12,299
Xeon E3-1270
14,722
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E3-1270 v2
9,465
Xeon E3-1270
9,832
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E3-1270 v2
2,072
Xeon E3-1270
2,222
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1270 v2 | vs | E3-1270 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 69W | 80W | |
Annual home energy cost | 16.62 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 60.44 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.52 pt/W | 10.9 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 56.06W | 65W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E3-1270 v2 | vs | E3-1270 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 35 | 34 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 0 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Number of displays supported | 0 | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 33,556.48 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E3-1270 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $355 | |
3770 vs E3-1270 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $355 | |
3770K vs E3-1270 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | $355 | |
E3-1240 v2 vs E3-1270 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $355 | |
E3-1230 v2 vs E3-1270 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $336 | |
2600 vs E3-1270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $336 | |
3770 vs E3-1270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $336 | |
E3-1230 v2 vs E3-1270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||