Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs E3-1260L v5 |
Released April, 2013
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Released October, 2015
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
- 2.9 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E3-1260L v5
| | Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Slightly higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.9 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.7 GHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 1.11 pt/$ | vs | 0.79 pt/$ | Around 40% better performance per dollar | |||
| Better performance per watt | 7.23 pt/W | vs | 5.17 pt/W | Around 40% better performance per watt | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Apr, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| Better PassMark score | 10,067 | vs | 8,691 | More than 15% better PassMark score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs E3-1260L v5
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | E3-1260L v5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 45W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 5.17 pt/W | 7.23 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 0 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
details | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | E3-1260L v5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 65,536 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $417 | $294 | |
| E3-1265L v4 vs E3-1265L v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $320 | $294 | |
| E3-1265L v2 vs E3-1265L v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $294 | |
| E3-1275L v3 vs E3-1265L v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $377 | $294 | |
| E3-1268L v3 vs E3-1265L v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $311 | $294 | |
| E3-1260L vs E3-1265L v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $294 | |
| E3-1230L v3 vs E3-1265L v3 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $294 | |
| 6700 vs E3-1260L v5 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
