0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs E3-1220LV2 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
![]() | Much more l3 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 7,745 |
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz | ![]() | More cores 4 |
VS
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E3-1220LV2
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E3-1220LV2
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 7,745 | vs | 4,427 | Around 75% better PassMark score | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.8 pt/$ | vs | 0.78 pt/$ | More than 3.5x better performance per dollar | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 13.81W | vs | 36.56W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs E3-1220LV2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1265L v2
10,597
Xeon E3-1220LV2
5,725
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1265L v2
2,661
Xeon E3-1220LV2
2,695.5
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1265L v2
2,050,000 MB/s
Xeon E3-1220LV2
182.8 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E3-1265L v2
7,745
Xeon E3-1220LV2
4,427
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E3-1265L v2
1,739
Xeon E3-1220LV2
1,708
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | E3-1220LV2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 19.91 pt/W | 8.68 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | E3-1220LV2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,150 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 33,556.48 MB | 33,003.52 MB |
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E3-1220LV2 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$320 | $311 | |
E3-1265L v2 vs E3-1260L | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$320 | $225 | |
E3-1265L v2 vs E3-1230 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$320 | $42 | |
E3-1265L v2 vs G1610T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$320 | $330 | |
E3-1265L v2 vs 3770T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$189 | $42 | |
E3-1220LV2 vs G1610T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$189 | $64 | |
E3-1220LV2 vs G2020T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$189 | $130 | |
E3-1220LV2 vs 3240 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||