CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1260L v5 vs E3-1240L v3 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5

Report a correction
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 40% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,137 vs 1,744 Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 10,067 vs 7,514 Around 35% better PassMark score
Better performance per dollar 1.11 pt/$ vs 0.91 pt/$ More than 20% better performance per dollar
Newer Oct, 2015 vs May, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 36.56W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 10.05 pt/W vs 7.23 pt/W Around 40% better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 10.84 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year vs 39.42 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1260L v5 vs E3-1240L v3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1260L v5  vs
E3-1240L v3 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s

details

Xeon E3-1260L v5  vs
E3-1240L v3 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

power consumption

TDP 45W 25W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 7.23 pt/W 10.05 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 20.31W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 0
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus