Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 2.2x higher turbo clock speed
Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Slightly lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 40.63W 10% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 12.04 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 43.8 $/year Around 10% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel E5-2608LV4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2608LV4

Report a correction
Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB vs 8 MB 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 65,536 MB Supports 24x more RAM
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Oct, 2015 Release date 3 months later

Features Key features of the Xeon E3-1260L v5  vs E5-2608LV4 

clock speed

E5-2608LV4
1.6 GHz

turbo clock speed

E5-2608LV4
1.7 GHz

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1260L v5  vs
E5-2608LV4 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 1,572,864 MB

details

Xeon E3-1260L v5  vs
E5-2608LV4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 16
L3 cache 8 MB 20 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 2

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

power consumption

TDP 45W 50W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 12.04 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 43.8 $/year
Typical power consumption 36.56W 40.63W

bus

Architecture FSB QPI
Number of links 1 2
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 6,400 MT/s
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Report a correction
Intel E5-2608LV4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus