Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 vs E3-1245V5 |
Released October, 2015
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
- 2.9 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
 | Significantly lower typical power consumption 36.56W | | Significantly better performance per watt 7.23 pt/W |
| | Better performance per dollar 1.11 pt/$ | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year |
VS
Released October, 2015
Intel E3-1245V5
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the E3-1245V5
| | Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 65W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better performance per watt | 7.23 pt/W | vs | 3.3 pt/W | Around 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 1.11 pt/$ | vs | 0.93 pt/$ | Around 20% better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1260L v5 vs E3-1245V5
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | E3-1245V5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 45W | 80W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 7.23 pt/W | 3.3 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 65W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
details | Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | E3-1245V5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.55 - 1.52V | 0.55 - 1.52V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics P530 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 400 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 65,536 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5  Report a correction |  Intel E3-1245V5 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $284 | |
| 6700 vs E3-1245V5 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $284 | |
| 6700K vs E3-1245V5 | ||
 | VS | |
| $355 | $284 | |
| E3-1275 v5 vs E3-1245V5 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $284 | |
| E3-1225 v5 vs E3-1245V5 | ||
 | VS | |
| $282 | $284 | |
| E3-1240V5 vs E3-1245V5 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $912 | $294 | |
| X5450 vs E3-1260L v5 | ||
 | VS | |
| $261 | $294 | |
| E3-1230V5 vs E3-1260L v5 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
