Intel Xeon E3-1258L v4 vs AMD Opteron 254 |
Released April, 2015
Intel Xeon E3-1258L v4
- 1.8 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1258L v4
 | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | More cores 4 |
| | More threads 8 | | Much lower typical power consumption 38.19W |
VS
Released August, 2005
AMD Opteron 254
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 254
| | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more threads | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 38.19W | vs | 75.24W | Around 50% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2015 | vs | Aug, 2005 | Release date over 9 years later | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 41.17 $/year | vs | 81.12 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 11.32 $/year | vs | 22.31 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E3-1258L v4 vs Opteron 254
clock speed
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1258L v4 | vs | Opteron 254 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Xeon E3-1258L v4 | vs | Opteron 254 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 8 | 1 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 2 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 47W | 92.6W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 11.32 $/year | 22.31 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 41.17 $/year | 81.12 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 38.19W | 75.24W | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1258L v4  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 254 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
