Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3 vs E3-1235L v5 |
Released May, 2014
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3
 | More threads 8 | | Better performance per watt 10.05 pt/W |
| | Better PassMark score 7,514 | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,744 |
VS
Released October, 2015
Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E3-1235L v5
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Slightly higher turbo clock speed 3 GHz | | Newer Oct, 2015 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better performance per watt | 10.05 pt/W | vs | 8.74 pt/W | Around 15% better performance per watt | |||
| Better PassMark score | 7,514 | vs | 6,352 | Around 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,744 | vs | 1,584 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | May, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1240L v3 vs E3-1235L v5
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1240L v3 | vs | E3-1235L v5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
details | Xeon E3-1240L v3 | vs | E3-1235L v5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 4 | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics P530 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 400 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 25W | 25W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.05 pt/W | 8.74 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 20.31W | 20.31W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 0 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $277 | $294 | |
| E3-1240L v3 vs E3-1265L v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $277 | $190 | |
| E3-1240L v3 vs 4460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $277 | $104 | |
| E3-1240L v3 vs C2538 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $277 | $399 | |
| E3-1240L v3 vs E3-1220L v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $277 | $250 | |
| E3-1240L v3 vs E3-1230L v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $277 | $445 | |
| E3-1240L v3 vs E3-1285L v4 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $277 | ||
| E3-1240L v3 vs J3455 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
