CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1240L v3 vs E3-1220L v3 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 85% higher turbo clock speed
Much better PassMark score 7,514 vs 2,110 More than 3.5x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,744 vs 829 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much more l3 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Newer May, 2014 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 10 months later
Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 10.56W vs 20.31W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 11.39 $/year vs 21.9 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 3.13 $/year vs 6.02 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1240L v3 vs E3-1220L v3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1240L v3  vs
E3-1220L v3 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s

details

Xeon E3-1240L v3  vs
E3-1220L v3 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

power consumption

TDP 25W 13W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 3.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 11.39 $/year
Performance per watt 10.05 pt/W 6.89 pt/W
Typical power consumption 20.31W 10.56W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 0 0
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus