Winner
Intel Core i5 3570
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570 based on its single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details | Intel Xeon E3-1235 vs Core i5 3570 |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W | ![]() | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,350 MHz |
![]() | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.61 pt/$ |
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Slightly higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz | ![]() | More number of displays supported 3 |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Core i5 3570CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 107.5W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | More than 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | More than 30% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.61 pt/$ | vs | 3.04 pt/$ | Around 20% better performance per dollar | |||
Much better performance per watt | 10.27 pt/W | vs | 4.22 pt/W | Around 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
Slightly more l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 38.81 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.6 °C | vs | 67 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 106 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.02 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,989 | vs | 1,838 | Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
summary | Xeon E3-1235 | vs | Core i5 3570 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 77W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 38.81 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 106 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.27 pt/W | 4.22 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 107.5W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E3-1235 | vs | Core i5 3570 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 8 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 32 | 34 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C | Unknown - 67°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 0 | 10 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics P3000 | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E3-1235 ![]() | Intel Core i5 3570 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $168 | |
3470 vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $168 | |
3770 vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $168 | |
4570 vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $168 | |
3570K vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $168 | |
2600 vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $168 | |
2500 vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $168 | |
2400 vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||