Winner
Intel Core i5 3570
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570 based on its single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details Intel Xeon E3-1235 vs Core i5 3570 |
Released April, 2011
Intel Xeon E3-1235
- 3.2 GHz
- Quad core
9 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1235
 | Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W | | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,350 MHz |
| | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz | | Much better performance per dollar 3.61 pt/$ |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i5 3570
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
8.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i5 3570
| | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
| | Slightly higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz | | More number of displays supported 3 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1235 vs 3570 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i5 3570CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 107.5W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | More than 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | More than 30% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.61 pt/$ | vs | 3.04 pt/$ | Around 20% better performance per dollar | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.27 pt/W | vs | 4.22 pt/W | Around 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Slightly more l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 38.81 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72.6 °C | vs | 67 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 106 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.02 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,989 | vs | 1,838 | Around 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1235 vs Core i5 3570
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1235 | vs | Core i5 3570 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 77W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 38.81 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 106 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.27 pt/W | 4.22 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 107.5W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Xeon E3-1235 | vs | Core i5 3570 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 32 | 34 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.6°C | Unknown - 67°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 0 | 10 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.2 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics P3000 | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1235  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 3570 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $180 | $168 | |
| 3470 vs 3570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $168 | |
| 3770 vs 3570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $160 | $168 | |
| 4570 vs 3570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $184 | $168 | |
| 3570K vs 3570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $168 | |
| 2600 vs 3570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $300 | $168 | |
| 2500 vs 3570 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $168 | |
| 2400 vs 3570 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
