CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1230 vs L5639

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Cost to Run

Commercial Energy Cost

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Cost to Run and Value

Winner
Intel Xeon E3-1230 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E3-1230  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E3-1230

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1230

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1230

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1230

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Much better geekbench (32-bit) score 12,429 vs 9,710 Around 30% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,823 vs 887 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 9,399 vs 5,248 Around 80% better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 18.04 pt/W vs 13.43 pt/W Around 35% better performance per watt
Front view of Intel Xeon 5600 L5639

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5600 L5639

Report a correction
More l3 cache 12 MB vs 8 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower typical power consumption 48.75W vs 65W 25% lower typical power consumption
More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 35% more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.13 GHz vs 3.74 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 52.56 $/year vs 70.08 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 14.45 $/year vs 19.27 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1230 vs 5600 L5639

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1230  vs
5600 L5639 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Quad core Hexa core
Socket type
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Is hyperthreaded Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 60W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 14.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 52.56 $/year
Performance per watt 18.04 pt/W 13.43 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 48.75W

details

Xeon E3-1230  vs
5600 L5639 
Threads 8 12
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.33 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 2

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.75 GHz 3.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.74 GHz 4.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz 3.65 GHz

bus

Architecture DMI QPI
Number of links 1 2
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,860 MT/s
Intel Xeon E3-1230
Report a correction
Intel Xeon 5600 L5639
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus