Winner
Intel Xeon E3-1230
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E3-1230 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details Intel Xeon E3-1230 vs Core i5 3570K |
Released April, 2011
Intel Xeon E3-1230
- 3.2 GHz
- Quad core
5.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1230
 | Much lower typical power consumption 65W | | Much better performance per watt 9.54 pt/W |
| | Supports trusted computing Yes | | Slightly more l3 cache 8 MB |
VS
Released April, 2012
Intel Core i5 3570K
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
8.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i5 3570K
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 1.23 fps | | Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
by snipekill2445 (Nov, 2012)It is very powerful, very good for overclocking and as long as you have a good cooler, the temps are alright.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1230 vs 3570K among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 107.5W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per watt | 9.54 pt/W | vs | 4.69 pt/W | More than 2x better performance per watt | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Slightly more l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better PassMark score | 9,315 | vs | 7,152 | More than 30% better PassMark score | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 38.81 $/year | 2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 3.21 pt/$ | vs | 3.09 pt/$ | Around 5% better performance per dollar | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 106 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | 1.23 fps | vs | 0.62 fps | Around 2x better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.59 GHz | vs | 3.73 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.71 GHz | vs | 3.64 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1230 vs Core i5 3570K
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Core i5 3570K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 77W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 38.81 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 106 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 9.54 pt/W | 4.69 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 107.5W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Core i5 3570K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 32 | 34 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 67.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 4 | 470 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.73 GHz | 4.59 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.64 GHz | 4.71 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 5,523.6 | 5,406.6 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.73 GHz | 4.59 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 10.x | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | 5,339.9 | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1230  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 3570K Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $128 | $184 | |
| 8350 vs 3570K | ||
 | VS | |
| $100 | $184 | |
| 6300 vs 3570K | ||
 | VS | |
| $264 | $184 | |
| 3770K vs 3570K | ||
 | VS | |
| $220 | $184 | |
| 2500K vs 3570K | ||
 | VS | |
| $192 | $184 | |
| 4670K vs 3570K | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $184 | |
| 3770 vs 3570K | ||
 | VS | |
| $184 | ||
| Q6600 vs 3570K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
