0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E3-1225 vs E3-1220L v3 |
Released April, 2011
Intel Xeon E3-1225
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1225
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,747 | ![]() | More cores 4 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3
- 1.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E3-1220L v3
![]() | Much better performance per watt 6.89 pt/W | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 10.56W |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1225CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 2.8x higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 2.2x higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,747 | vs | 829 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 4 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| |||||||
Much better performance per watt | 6.89 pt/W | vs | 2.31 pt/W | Around 3x better performance per watt | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 10.56W | vs | 77.19W | 7.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 11.39 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 7.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.13 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 7.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Apr, 2011 | Release date over 2 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1225 vs E3-1220L v3
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E3-1225
5,954
Xeon E3-1220L v3
2,110
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E3-1225
1,747
Xeon E3-1220L v3
829
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1225 | vs | E3-1220L v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
details | Xeon E3-1225 | vs | E3-1220L v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics P3000 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 13W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 3.13 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 11.39 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.31 pt/W | 6.89 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 10.56W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
Intel Xeon E3-1225 ![]() | Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $217 | |
3770K vs E3-1225 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $217 | |
2400 vs E3-1225 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $217 | |
3470 vs E3-1225 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $217 | |
3770 vs E3-1225 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $217 | |
2500 vs E3-1225 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$273 | $217 | |
E3-1245 vs E3-1225 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $217 | |
W3520 vs E3-1225 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||