Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 3 MB Around 2.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 12.05 fps vs 7.87 fps Around 55% better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
Better PassMark score 7,137 vs 4,786 Around 50% better PassMark score
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Better turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 1,150 MHz Around 5% better turbo clock speed
Front view of Intel Core i3 4130

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4130

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 7.2 pt/$ vs 4.72 pt/$ Around 55% better performance per dollar
Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 43.88W vs 68.25W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year vs 20.24 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year vs 73.58 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.58 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Apr, 2013 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1225 v3 vs Core i3 4130

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Xeon E3-1225 v3
11.21 mHash/s
Core i3 4130
7.77 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Xeon E3-1225 v3
15.71 mPixels/s
Core i3 4130
13.92 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Xeon E3-1225 v3
1.61 fps
Core i3 4130
1.08 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E3-1225 v3
4,250,000 MB/s
Core i3 4130
3,840,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1225 v3  vs
Core i3 4130 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 54W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 13.01 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 47.3 $/year
Performance per watt 13.25 pt/W 13.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 43.88W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI 2.0
Number of links 0 0
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E3-1225 v3  vs
Core i3 4130 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.48 GHz 3.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 3.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.48 GHz 3.47 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics P4600 Intel® HD graphics 4400
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,200 MHz 1,150 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 4130
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus