Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1220LV2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1220LV2

Report a correction
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,725 vs 3,061 More than 85% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much better performance per watt 8.68 pt/W vs 3.69 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 28.44W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,708 vs 1,201 More than 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610T

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 3.08 pt/$ vs 0.78 pt/$ Around 4x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.44 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2013 vs May, 2012 Release date 8 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1220LV2 vs Celeron G1610T

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E3-1220LV2
182.8 MB/s
Celeron G1610T
119,750 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1220LV2  vs
Celeron G1610T 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 35W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 8.68 pt/W 3.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 28.44W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E3-1220LV2  vs
Celeron G1610T 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 23

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 2.44 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 33,003.52 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1220LV2
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1610T
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus