CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1220L v3 vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3

Report a correction
Better performance per watt 6.89 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 60% better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 829 vs 534 More than 55% better PassMark (Single core) score
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 60% higher turbo clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.46 pt/$ More than 10% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1220L v3 vs Celeron J1900

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E3-1220L v3  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.5 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB

details

Xeon E3-1220L v3  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 13W 10W
Annual home energy cost 3.13 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 11.39 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 6.89 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 10.56W 8.13W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 0 1
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus