Winner
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 vs Atom C2750 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
5.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
 | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz |
| | Much better PassMark score 6,602 | | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,806 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2750
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Atom C2750
| | More cores 8 | | Much lower typical power consumption 16.25W |
| | More threads 8 | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E3-1220 v2 vs C2750 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 6,602 | vs | 3,344 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,806 | vs | 579 | More than 3x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.45 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 16.25W | vs | 56.06W | 3.4x lower typical power consumption | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | vs | 60.44 $/year | 3.4x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 16.62 $/year | 3.4x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1220 v2 vs Atom C2750
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Atom C2750 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 69W | 20W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 16.62 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 60.44 $/year | 17.52 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.51 pt/W | 11.79 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 56.06W | 16.25W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Atom C2750 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.45 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.45 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
 Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2  Report a correction |  Intel Atom C2750 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $210 | $200 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1220 vs v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $200 | |
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs Xeon E3-1220 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $168 | $200 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs Xeon E3-1220 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $200 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $200 | |
| Intel Core i7 3770 vs Xeon E3-1220 v2 | ||
 | VS | |
| $264 | $200 | |
| Intel Core i7 3770K vs Xeon E3-1220 v2 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $98 | $171 | |
| Intel Core i3 4130 vs Atom C2750 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
