0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 vs Atom C2750 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz |
![]() | Much better PassMark score 6,602 | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,806 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2750
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2750
![]() | More cores 8 | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 16.25W |
![]() | More threads 8 | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better PassMark score | 6,602 | vs | 3,344 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,806 | vs | 579 | More than 3x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.45 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 16.25W | vs | 56.06W | 3.4x lower typical power consumption | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | vs | 60.44 $/year | 3.4x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 16.62 $/year | 3.4x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E3-1220 v2 vs Atom C2750
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1220 v2
9,259
Atom C2750
6,808
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1220 v2
2,768
Atom C2750
1,089
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E3-1220 v2
2,200,000 MB/s
Atom C2750
412,200 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E3-1220 v2
6,602
Atom C2750
3,344
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E3-1220 v2
1,806
Atom C2750
579
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Atom C2750 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 69W | 20W | |
Annual home energy cost | 16.62 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 60.44 $/year | 17.52 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 13.51 pt/W | 11.79 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 56.06W | 16.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Atom C2750 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.45 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.45 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s |
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 ![]() | Intel Atom C2750 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$210 | $200 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1220 vs v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $200 | |
Intel Core i5 3470 vs Xeon E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $200 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$168 | $200 | |
Intel Core i5 3570 vs Xeon E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $200 | |
Intel Core i7 3770K vs Xeon E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$238 | $200 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1230 vs E3-1220 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $171 | |
Intel Core i3 4130 vs Atom C2750 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||