Winner
Intel Core i7 6700
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 6700 based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon D-1528 vs Core i7 6700 |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Significantly better performance per watt 7.25 pt/W |
![]() | More cores 6 | ![]() | More threads 12 |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 4 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.98 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
8.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 52.81W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W | vs | 4.09 pt/W | More than 75% better performance per watt | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 8 | 4 more threads | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2015 | Release date 3 months later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 80% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | 60% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.98 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,159 | vs | 1,385 | More than 55% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better performance per dollar | 0.87 pt/$ | vs | 0.65 pt/$ | Around 35% better performance per dollar | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.18 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better PassMark score | 10,038 | vs | 8,612 | More than 15% better PassMark score |
summary | Xeon D-1528 | vs | Core i7 6700 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W | 4.09 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon D-1528 | vs | Core i7 6700 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 8 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.98 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.9 GHz | 4.18 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.9 GHz | 3.98 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 131,072 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel Xeon D-1528 ![]() | Intel Core i7 6700 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $305 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs 4790 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $240 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs i5 6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs i5 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700 vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||