Winner
Intel Core i7 4790K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4790K based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel Xeon D-1518 vs Core i7 4790K |
Released October, 2015
Intel Xeon D-1518
- 2.2 GHz
- Quad core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon D-1518
 | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Supports trusted computing Yes | | Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Core i7 4790K
- 4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
9.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4790K
| | Much higher turbo clock speed 4.4 GHz | | Much higher clock speed 4 GHz |
| | Much better performance per dollar 3.69 pt/$ | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of D-1518 vs 4790K among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 9.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i7 4790KCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 71.5W | 2.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 21.2 $/year | 2.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 77.09 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Apr, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Supports more RAM | 131,072 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 4x more RAM | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 4.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | 2x higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 80% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.69 pt/$ | vs | 0.67 pt/$ | More than 5.5x better performance per dollar | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,530 | vs | 1,087 | More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.63 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 11.42 pt/W | vs | 4.49 pt/W | More than 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 11,194 | vs | 4,700 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon D-1518 vs Core i7 4790K
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon D-1518 | vs | Core i7 4790K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 88W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 21.2 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 77.09 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.49 pt/W | 11.42 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 71.5W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
details | Xeon D-1518 | vs | Core i7 4790K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.63 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 4.63 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,250 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 131,072 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Xeon D-1518  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 4790K Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $272 | |
| 4690K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $390 | $272 | |
| 5820K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $248 | $272 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $272 | |
| 4790 vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $272 | |
| 6600K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $230 | $272 | |
| 9590 vs 4790K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
