Winner
Intel Core i5 6200U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 6200U based on its single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details Intel Xeon D-1518 vs Core i5 6200U |
Released October, 2015
Intel Xeon D-1518
- 2.2 GHz
- Quad core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon D-1518
 | Supports trusted computing Yes | | More cores 4 |
| | More threads 8 | | Better performance per dollar 0.67 pt/$ |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i5 6200U
- 2.3 GHz
- Dual core
8.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i5 6200U
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz |
| | Much better performance per watt 10.6 pt/W | | Lower typical power consumption 12.19W |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of D-1518 vs 6200U among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.4 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i5 6200UCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 0.67 pt/$ | vs | 0.57 pt/$ | Around 20% better performance per dollar | |||
| Supports more RAM | 131,072 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 4x more RAM | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2015 | Release date 3 months later | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 10.6 pt/W | vs | 4.49 pt/W | More than 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 12.19W | vs | 28.44W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,500 | vs | 1,087 | Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon D-1518 vs Core i5 6200U
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon D-1518 | vs | Core i5 6200U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 35W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.49 pt/W | 10.6 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Xeon D-1518 | vs | Core i5 6200U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 520 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 300 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 131,072 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Xeon D-1518  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 6200U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A10-9600P vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $281 | |
| 5200U vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $393 | $281 | |
| 6500U vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7200U vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6th Gen A10-8700P vs 6200U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
