Intel Xeon 7120N vs Celeron 1000M |
Released August, 2006
Intel Xeon 7120N
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 7120N
 | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 | | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
| | Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1000M
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron 1000M
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 32 | vs | 1 | 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Slightly more l3 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 77.19W | 2.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 60 °C | 75% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Aug, 2006 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 2.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon 7120N vs Celeron 1000M
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 7120N | vs | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 604 | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 28.44W | |
details | Xeon 7120N | vs | Celeron 1000M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 32 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 18 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 60°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 667 MHz | 100 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon 7120N  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 1000M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $75 | $225 | |
| 1000M vs 2328M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 1000M vs 1800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | $232 | |
| 1000M vs B960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | $134 | |
| 1000M vs 2020M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 1000M vs 1200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | $86 | |
| 1000M vs B830 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | $134 | |
| 1000M vs 2030M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
