0 Comments
| Intel Xeon 7120N vs Celeron 1000M |
Released August, 2006
Intel Xeon 7120N
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 7120N
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1000M
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron 1000M
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 32 | vs | 1 | 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly more l3 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 77.19W | 2.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 60 °C | 75% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Aug, 2006 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 2.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon 7120N vs Celeron 1000M
clock speed
Xeon 7120N
3 GHz
Celeron 1000M
1.8 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon 7120N
4 MB
Celeron 1000M
1 MB
L3 cache
Xeon 7120N
4 MB
Celeron 1000M
2 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon 7120N
3 GHz
Celeron 1000M
1.8 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon 7120N
3 GHz
Celeron 1000M
1.8 GHz
TDP
Xeon 7120N
95W
Celeron 1000M
35W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 7120N | vs | Celeron 1000M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
604 | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 28.44W |
details | Xeon 7120N | vs | Celeron 1000M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 32 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 18 | 18 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 667 MHz | 100 MHz |
Intel Xeon 7120N ![]() | Intel Celeron 1000M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $244 | |
1000M vs B960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $225 | |
1000M vs 2328M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1000M vs 1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1000M vs 1200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $134 | |
1000M vs 2020M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $75 | |
1000M vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $86 | |
1000M vs B830 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||