Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 7110M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 7110M

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 vs 1 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500S

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500S

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Slightly more l3 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Aug, 2006 Release date over 4 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 69.1 °C vs 60 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Xeon 7110M  vs Core i5 2500S 

clock speed

Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i5 2500S
2.7 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i5 2500S
3.33 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i5 2500S
2.8 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 7110M  vs
Core i5 2500S 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
604
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 52.81W

details

Xeon 7110M  vs
Core i5 2500S 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 32 1
Clock multiplier 13 27
Operating temperature Unknown - 60°C Unknown - 69.1°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.6 GHz 3.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.6 GHz 3.33 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon 7110M
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2500S
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus