0 Comments
| Intel Xeon 7110M vs Core i5 2500S |
Released August, 2006
Intel Xeon 7110M
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 7110M
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core |
VS
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i5 2500S
- 2.7 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 2500S
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 32 | vs | 1 | 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Slightly more l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 4 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Aug, 2006 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 69.1 °C | vs | 60 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Xeon 7110M vs Core i5 2500S
clock speed
Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i5 2500S
2.7 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon 7110M
4 MB
Core i5 2500S
1 MB
L3 cache
Xeon 7110M
4 MB
Core i5 2500S
6 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i5 2500S
3.33 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i5 2500S
2.8 GHz
TDP
Xeon 7110M
95W
Core i5 2500S
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 7110M | vs | Core i5 2500S |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
604 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W |
details | Xeon 7110M | vs | Core i5 2500S |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 32 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 27 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60°C | Unknown - 69.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.33 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | 3.33 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 850 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,100 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Xeon 7110M ![]() | Intel Core i5 2500S ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $300 | |
2500S vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $205 | |
2500S vs 2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $220 | |
2500S vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $135 | |
2500S vs 2120 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $305 | |
2500S vs 2600S | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $180 | |
2500S vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $160 | |
2500S vs 4570 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||