0 Comments
| Intel Xeon 7110M vs Core i3 3110M |
Released August, 2006
Intel Xeon 7110M
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 7110M
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3110M
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3110M
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 32 | vs | 1 | 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1.5 MB/core | Around 35% more l3 cache per core | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.43 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 77.19W | 2.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 60 °C | 75% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Aug, 2006 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 2.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Xeon 7110M vs Core i3 3110M
clock speed
Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i3 3110M
2.4 GHz
L2 cache
Xeon 7110M
4 MB
Core i3 3110M
0.5 MB
L3 cache
Xeon 7110M
4 MB
Core i3 3110M
3 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i3 3110M
2.43 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Xeon 7110M
2.6 GHz
Core i3 3110M
2.4 GHz
TDP
Xeon 7110M
95W
Core i3 3110M
35W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 7110M | vs | Core i3 3110M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
604 | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon 7110M | vs | Core i3 3110M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 32 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 13 | 24 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.43 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | 2.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz |
Intel Xeon 7110M ![]() | Intel Core i3 3110M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | ||
3110M vs 4500M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $161 | |
3110M vs N3530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $225 | |
3110M vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | ||
3110M vs 6210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $134 | |
3110M vs 2020M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | ||
3110M vs 4400M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $161 | |
3110M vs N3520 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||