Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 7030

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 7030

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 32 vs 1 31 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 134.06W 3x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Nov, 2005 Release date over 7 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 39.75 $/year 3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 144.54 $/year 3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon 7030  vs Celeron G1610 

clock speed

Xeon 7030
2.8 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.6 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon 7030
2.8 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.69 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon 7030
2.8 GHz
Celeron G1610
2.68 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 7030  vs
Celeron G1610 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
604
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 165W 55W
Annual home energy cost 39.75 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 144.54 $/year 48.18 $/year
Typical power consumption 134.06W 44.69W

details

Xeon 7030  vs
Celeron G1610 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 32 1
Clock multiplier 14 26

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 2.68 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.8 GHz 2.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon 7030
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1610
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus