CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5160 vs 5133 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Xeon 5133

Intel Xeon 5133

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5160

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5160

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Front view of Intel Xeon 5133

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5133

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 32.5W vs 65W 2x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year vs 70.08 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year vs 19.27 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5160 vs 5133

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 5160
1,971
Xeon 5133
1,598

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon 5160
1,130
Xeon 5133
862

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5160  vs
5133 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 40W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 9.64 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 35.04 $/year
Performance per watt 1.56 pt/W 2.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 32.5W

details

Xeon 5160  vs
5133 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 4 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 2 2
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 1.15 - 1.25V

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 800 MHz
Intel Xeon 5160
Report a correction
Intel Xeon 5133
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus