0 Comments
| Intel Xeon 5160 vs 5063 |
Released June, 2006
Intel Xeon 5160
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 5160
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 65W | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year |
![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Xeon 5063
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 5063
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.53 GHz |
![]() | More threads 4 | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 77.19W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.53 GHz | vs | 3.63 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Xeon 5160 vs 5063
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 5160 | vs | 5063 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 77.19W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
details | Xeon 5160 | vs | 5063 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 376,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.5V | 1.07 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 65°C | Unknown - 67°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.63 GHz | 4.53 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.63 GHz | 4.53 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
Intel Xeon 5160 ![]() | Intel Xeon 5063 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $264 | |
5160 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $179 | |
5160 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $748 | |
5160 vs X5355 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $168 | |
5160 vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $1,164 | |
5160 vs X5365 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $180 | |
5160 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$903 | $205 | |
5160 vs 2400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||