CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5150 vs 4150 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 4150 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 4150  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i3 4150

Intel Core i3 4150

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5150

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Core i3 4150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 4150

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 5.92 pt/$ vs 0.16 pt/$ Around 36.5x better performance per dollar
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.66 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 1.24 fps vs 0.12 fps Around 10.8x better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per watt 13.38 pt/W vs 1.73 pt/W Around 7.8x better performance per watt
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,020 vs 1,020 Around 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Jun, 2006 Release date over 7 years later
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 6,509 vs 4,970 More than 30% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Lower typical power consumption 43.88W vs 52.81W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 65 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5150 vs Core i3 4150

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Xeon 5150
0.12 fps
Core i3 4150
1.24 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5150
4,970
Core i3 4150
6,509

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5150
1,413
Core i3 4150
3,056

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5150
106,800 MB/s
Core i3 4150
3,865,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5150
2,462
Core i3 4150
6,508

GeekBench

Xeon 5150
2,908
Core i3 4150
7,012

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 5150
1,741
Core i3 4150
4,904

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon 5150
1,020
Core i3 4150
2,020

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5150  vs
Core i3 4150 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1150

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon 5150  vs
Core i3 4150 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 8 35
Operating temperature Unknown - 65°C Unknown - 72°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD graphics 4400

power consumption

TDP 65W 54W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 13.01 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 47.3 $/year
Performance per watt 1.73 pt/W 13.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 43.88W
Intel Xeon 5150
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 4150
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus