Intel Xeon 5148 vs 5133 |
Released September, 2006
Intel Xeon 5148
- 2.33 GHz
- Dual core
4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon 5148
 | Higher clock speed 2.33 GHz |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5148 vs 5133 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon 5148CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.33 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 5133 vs the 5148. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5148 vs 5133
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon 5148 | vs | 5133 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 40W | 40W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 9.64 $/year | 9.64 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 35.04 $/year | 35.04 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.89 pt/W | 2.03 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 32.5W | 32.5W | |
details | Xeon 5148 | vs | 5133 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Voltage range | 1.15 - 1.25V | 1.15 - 1.25V | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 800 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon 5148  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon 5133 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $557 | $125 | |
| 5148 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $557 | $98 | |
| 5148 vs 4130 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $557 | $179 | |
| 5148 vs Q8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $557 | $117 | |
| 5148 vs E4500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $557 | $179 | |
| 5148 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $557 | $180 | |
| 5148 vs 3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $557 | $119 | |
| 5148 vs E4400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
