CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5148 vs 3470 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i5 3470 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3470  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470

Intel Core i5 3470

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon 5148

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5148

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 32.5W vs 86.05W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much lower annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year vs 31.22 $/year 3.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year vs 84.62 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3470

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.33 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.7 pt/$ vs 0.14 pt/$ Around 20x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,906 vs 900 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 6,607 vs 1,590 Around 4.2x better PassMark score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Sep, 2006 Release date over 5 years later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 4.41 pt/W vs 1.89 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.67 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 67.4 °C vs 58 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.09 GHz vs 2.33 GHz More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon 5148 vs Core i5 3470

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5148
4,216
Core i5 3470
9,436

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5148
1,200
Core i5 3470
2,983

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon 5148
98.1 MB/s
Core i5 3470
2,470,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon 5148
1,590
Core i5 3470
6,607

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon 5148  vs
Core i5 3470 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 40W 77W
Annual home energy cost 9.64 $/year 31.22 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 35.04 $/year 84.62 $/year
Performance per watt 1.89 pt/W 4.41 pt/W
Typical power consumption 32.5W 86.05W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1

details

Xeon 5148  vs
Core i5 3470 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 1,400,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 7 32
Voltage range 1.15 - 1.25V Unknown - 1.13V
Operating temperature Unknown - 58°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.1 GHz 3.67 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.33 GHz 4.09 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz 3.67 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Xeon 5148
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3470
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus